Mailing List Articles Atom Feed Comments Atom Feed Twitter Reddit Facebook

Tag Cloud

3d 3d printing account algorithms android announcement architecture archives arduino artificial intelligence artix assembly async audio automation backups bash batch blender blog bookmarklet booting bug hunting c sharp c++ challenge chrome os cluster code codepen coding conundrums coding conundrums evolved command line compilers compiling compression containerisation css dailyprogrammer data analysis debugging demystification distributed computing dns docker documentation downtime electronics email embedded systems encryption es6 features ethics event experiment external first impressions freeside future game github github gist gitlab graphics hardware hardware meetup holiday holidays html html5 html5 canvas infrastructure interfaces internet interoperability io.js jabber jam javascript js bin labs learning library linux lora low level lua maintenance manjaro minetest network networking nibriboard node.js open source operating systems optimisation own your code pepperminty wiki performance phd photos php pixelbot portable privacy problem solving programming problems project projects prolog protocol protocols pseudo 3d python reddit redis reference releases rendering resource review rust searching secrets security series list server software sorting source code control statistics storage svg systemquery talks technical terminal textures thoughts three thing game three.js tool tutorial tutorials twitter ubuntu university update updates upgrade version control virtual reality virtualisation visual web website windows windows 10 worldeditadditions xmpp xslt

How to contribute code to git repositories that aren't hosted on GitHub

With just over 48 million public repositories (and growing fast [^repos]), GitHub is pretty much the de-facto place to host code, as pretty much everyone has an account there. By far the most useful feature GitHub provides is the ability to open pull requests (PRs).

Not all code repositories are hosted on GitHub, however - and these repositories do not get the same exposure and hence level of participation and collaboration that those on GitHub do, due in no small part (other reasons exist too though) I suspect because contributing to these repositories is unfortunately more complicated than opening a PR.

It needn't be this way though - so in this post I'll show you how to unlock the power of contributing code to quite literally any project that is under git version control. While knowledge of your command line is necessary, basic familiarity will suffice (see also my blog post on learning your terminal). I'll also assume that you have git installed, and that Windows users have already opened Git Bash and navigated to the cloned repository in question with cd.

Step 0: Making your changes

This is the easy part. After cloning your repository in the normal way, make a new branch for your changes. GUI users should be able to navigate their interfaces. For those using the command line, do this from the source branch you want to branch from:

git switch -c new_branch_name

Then, make your changes in the usual way.

Step 1: Find contact details

Once you have your changes, you need to find somewhere to send them. This is different for every repository, but here are some common places to check for contact details:

  • The project's README file
  • The project's website (if it has one)
  • Track down the author's name on other websites
  • Email addresses of commits

Step 2: Make a patch file

Now that you've found a place to send your contribution to, we need to pack it into a nice neat box that can be transported (usually via email as an attachment). Doing so is fairly simple. You need to first identify the hashes of the commits you want to include. Do that with this command:

git log --one-line --graph --decorate

You might get some output that looks a bit like this:

* c443459 (HEAD -> some-patch) wireframe/corner_set: fix luacheck warnings
* 3d12345 //smake: fix luacheck warnings
* 4c7bb6a //sfactor: fix luacheck warnings; fix crash
* 67b4495 (HEAD -> main, origin/main) README: add link to edit full reference
* ee46507 fixup
* 58933c6 README: Update command list
* 6c49b9d fixup again
* 364de73 fixup

In your terminal it will probably be coloured. The 7 digit hexadecimal value (e.g. 4c7bb6a) there is the commit hash. Copy the commit hash of the oldest and the newest commits in question, and then do this:

git format-patch --stdout OLDHASH..NEWHASH >somefilename.patch

...replacing OLDHASH and NEWHASH with the oldest and newest commit hashes respectively. If the newest commit hash is the latest commit on the branch, then the keyword HEAD can also be used instead.

Step 3: Submit patch file

Now that you have a patch file, you can send it to the author. By email, instant messaging, or avian carriers - any means of communication will do!

This is all there is to it. If you've received such a patch and are unsure about what to do though, keep reading.

But what happens if I receive a contribution?

If you've received a patch file generated by the above method and don't know what to do with it, read on! You may have received a patch file for a variety of reasons:

  • Someone's interested in improving your project
  • You've previously sent a contribution to someone else, and they've sent back a patch of their own along with a code review of things you need to change or improve

Either way, it's easy to apply it to your git repository. First, make sure you have the branch in question you want to apply the commits to checked out. Then, download the patch file, and do this:

git am path/to/somefile.patch

...this will apply the commits contained within to the currently checked out branch for you. If you're unsure about what they contain, don't forget that you can always open the patch file in your text editor and inspect it, or do this to see a quick summary:

grep Subject: path/to/somefile.patch

Once a patch file is applied, you can handle things in the usual way - for example you'll probably want to use git push to push the commit(s) to your remote, or perhaps git rebase -i to clean them up first.


In this post, I've shown you how to create and apply patch files. This is extremely useful when dealing with sending patches to code repositories that are either on servers where you can't create an account to open a pull request (e.g. Gitea) or just simply doesn't have a pull request system at all. It can even be used in extreme situations where a given code repository doesn't have a central remote server at all - this is surely where git get's its reputation as a distributed version control system.

Sources and further reading

[repos]: Ref as of 2022-01-06

Saving power in Linux Systems

Hey there! It's an impromptu blog post. Originally I wrote this in response to this Reddit post, but it got rather longer than I anticipated and I ended up expanding on it just a teensy bit more and turning into this blog post.

Saving power in a Linux system can be necessary for a number of reasons, from reducing one's electricity bill to extending battery life.

There are a number of different factors to consider to reduce power usage, which I'll be talking about in this blog post. I will be assuming a headless Linux server for the purposes of this blog post, but these suggestions can be applicable to other systems too (if there's the demand I may write a follow up specifically about Arduino and ESP-based systems, as there are a number of tricks that can be applied there that don't work the same way for a full Linux system).

Of course, power usage is highly situationally dependant, and it's all about trade-offs: less convenience, increased complexity, and so on. The suggestions below are suggestions and rules of thumb that may or may not be applicable to your specific situation.

Hardware: Older hardware is less power efficient than newer hardware. So while using that 10yr old desktop as a server sounds like a great idea to reduce upfront costs, if your electricity is expensive it might be more cost-effective to buy a newer machine such as an Intel NUC or Raspberry Pi.

Even within the realms of Raspberry Pis, not every Raspberry Pi is created equal. If you need a little low-power outpost for counting cows in field with LoRa, then something like a Raspberry Pi Zero as a base might be more suitable than a fully Raspberry Pi 4B+ for example.

CPU architecture: Different CPU architectures have different performance / watt ratios. For example. AMD CPUs are - on the whole - more efficient than Intel CPUs as of 2021. What really matters here is the manufacturing size and density - e.g. a 7nm chip will be more power efficient than a 12nm or 14nm one.

ARM CPUs (e.g. Raspberry Pi and friends) are more efficient again (though the rule-of-thumb about manufacturing size & density does not hold true here). If you haven't yet bought any hardware for your next project, this is definitely worth considering.

Auto-on: Depending on your task, you might only need your device on for a short time each day. Most BIOSes will have a setting to automatically power on at a set time, so you could do this and then set the server to automatically power off when it has completed it's task.

Another consideration is automatically entering standby. This can be done with the rtcwake command. While not as power efficient as turning completely off, it should still net measurable power savings.

Firmware: Tools such as powertop (sudo apt install powertop on Debian-based systems) can help apply a number of optimisations. In the case of powertop, don't forget to add the optimisations you choose to your /etc/rc.local to auto-apply them on boot. Example things that you can optimise using powertop include:

  • Runtime power management for WiFi / Bluetooth
  • SATA power management

Disk activity: Again situationally dependent, but if you have a lot of disks attached to your server, reducing writes can have a positive impact on power usage. Tuning this is generally done with the hdparm command (sudo apt install hdparm). See this Unix Stack Exchange question, and also this Ask Ubuntu answer for more details on how this is done.

Software: Different applications will use different amounts of system resources, which in turn will consume different amounts of power. For example, GitLab is rather resource inefficient, but Gitea is much more efficient with resources. Objectively evaluating multiple possible candidate programs that solve your given problem is important if power savings are critical to your use-case.

Measuring resource usage over time (e.g. checking the CPU Time column in htop for example) is probably the most effective way of measuring this, though you'd want to devise an experiment where you run each candidate program in turn for a defined length of time and measure a given set of metrics - e.g. CPU time.

Measurement: Speaking of metrics, it's worth noting that while all these suggestions are interesting, you should absolutely measure the real power savings you get from implementing these suggestions. Some will give you more of a net gain for less work than others.

The best way I know of to do this is to use a power monitor like this one that I've bought previously and plugging your device into it, and then coming back a given amount of time later to record the total number of watt hours of electricity used. For USB devices such as the Raspberry Pi, if I remember rightly I purchased this device a while back, and it works rather well.

This will definitively tell you whether implementing a given measure will net you a significant decrease in power usage or not, which you can then weight against the effort required.

Art by Mythdael