Starbeamrainbowlabs

Stardust
Blog


Archive

Mailing List Articles Atom Feed Comments Atom Feed Twitter Reddit Facebook

Tag Cloud

3d account algorithms announcement architecture archives arduino artificial intelligence artix assembly async audio bash batch blog bookmarklet booting c sharp c++ challenge chrome os code codepen coding conundrums coding conundrums evolved command line compilers compiling css dailyprogrammer debugging demystification distributed computing downtime electronics email embedded systems encryption es6 features event experiment external first impressions future game github github gist graphics hardware hardware meetup holiday html html5 html5 canvas infrastructure interfaces internet io.js jabber javascript js bin labs learning library linux low level lua maintenance manjaro network networking node.js operating systems performance photos php pixelbot portable privacy programming problems project projects prolog protocol protocols pseudo 3d python reddit reference release releases resource review rust secrets security series list server software sorting source code control statistics svg technical terminal textures three thing game three.js tool tutorial tutorials twitter ubuntu university update updates upgrade version control virtual reality virtualisation visual web website windows windows 10 xmpp xslt

Run a program on your dedicated AMD graphics card on Linux

I've recently figured out how to run a program on my dedicated AMD R7 M445 graphics card in Ubuntu 17.04, and since it's taken me far too long to around figuring it out, I thought I'd note it down here for future reference - if it helps you too, let me know in the comments below!

It's actually really simple. First, check that your dedicated AMD graphics card shows up with lspci:

lspci

If it's anything like my setup, you'll get a pair of rows like this (though they might not be next to each other):

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation HD Graphics 620 (rev 02)
01:00.0 Display controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Topaz XT [Radeon R7 M260/M265 / M340/M360 / M440/M445] (rev c3)

Thankfully, my dedicated AMD card is showing (better than it did in previous versions of ubuntu, too, which thought it was an M225!). Next, we need to check that the amdgpu kernel module is loaded with a quick lsmod:

lsmod | grep -i amd

On my laptop, I get this:

amdkfd                139264  1
amd_iommu_v2           20480  1 amdkfd
amdgpu               1564672  1
i2c_algo_bit           16384  2 amdgpu,i915
ttm                    98304  1 amdgpu
drm_kms_helper        151552  2 amdgpu,i915
drm                   352256  9 amdgpu,i915,ttm,drm_kms_helper

Yay! It's loaded. Now to do a test to see if we can run anything on it:

glxinfo | grep "OpenGL renderer"
DRI_PRIME=1 glxinfo | grep "OpenGL renderer"

The above runs glxinfo twice: Once on the integrated graphics card, and once on the dedicated graphics card. The key here is the DRI_PRIME=1 environment variable - this tells the amdgpu driver that this process should run on the dedicated graphics and not the integrated graphics card. On my machine, I get this output:

OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) HD Graphics 620 (Kabylake GT2) 
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD ICELAND (DRM 3.9.0 / 4.10.0-33-generic, LLVM 4.0.0)

As you can see, the latter invocation of the command ran on the dedicated AMD graphics card, and the former on the integrated graphics. So simple!

Now that we've verified that it works, we can do it with any program:

DRI_PRIME=1 inkscape

Did this you find this helpful? Did it work (or not)? Let me know in the comments!

Sources

The Graphics Pipeline

Since the demonstration for my 3D work is tomorrow and I keep forgetting the details of the OpenGL graphics pipeline, I thought I'd write a blog post about it in the hopes that I'll remember it.

In case you didn't know, OpenGL uses a pipeline system to render graphics. Basically, your vertices and other stuff go in one end, and a video stream gets displayed at the other. This pipeline is made up of number of stages. Each stage has it's own shader, too:

The OpenGL pipeline.

There are rather a lot of stages here, so I've made this table that lists all the different shaders along with what they do:

Stage Programmable? Function
Vertex Shader Yes Raw vertex manipulation.
Hull Shader No Aka the Tessellation Control Shader. Determines control points for the tessellator. Although it's fixed function, it's highly configurable.
Tessellator No Subdivides surfaces and adds vertices using the control points specified in the hull shader.
Domain Shader Yes Aka the Tessellation Evaluation Shader. Adds details to vertices. Example uses include simplifying models that are far away from the camera. Has access to the control points outputted by the hull shader.
Geometry Shader Yes Superseded by the tessellator (see above). Very slow.
Rasterisation No Fixed function. Converts the models etc. into fragments ready for the fragment shader.
Fragment Shader Yes Insanely flexible. This is the shader that is used to add most, if not all, special effects. Lighting and shadows are done here too. Oddly enough, Microsoft decided that they would call it the "Pixel Shader" in DirectX and not the fragment shader.
Compute Shader Yes Not part of the graphics pipeline. Lets you utilise the power of the matrix calculator graphics card to do arbitrary calculations.

The tessellator is very interesting. It replaces the geometry shader (which, although you can technically use, you really shouldn't), and allows you to add details to your model on the GPU, thereby reducing the number of vertices you send to graphics card. It also allows you to customize your models before they hit rasterisation and the fragment shader, so you could simplify those models that are further away, for instance.

As an example in our lecture, we were shown the Haven Benchmark. Our lecturer turned the tessellator on and off to show us what it actually does. Since you can't see what I saw, here's an animation I made showing you the difference:

The other pipeline to be aware of is the coordinate pipeline. This pipeline specifies how coordinates are transformed from one space to another. Here's another diagram:

The coordinate pipeline.

Again, this looks complicated, but it isn't really. A similar process would be followed for 2D graphics as well as 3D ones. If you take it one step at a time, it doesn't seem so bad.

  • Model Space - This refers to coordinates relative to any given model. Each model will have the coordinates of each of its vertices stored relative to its central point.
  • World Space - Multiplying all of a model's coordinates by the model matrix brings it into World Space. World space is relative to the centre of your scene.
  • View Space - Multiplying all the coordinates in a world by the view matrix brings everything into into View Space. View Space is relative to the camera. It is for this reason that people say that you cheat and move everything around the camera - instead of moving the camera around a scene.
  • Normalised Device Space - Multiplying everything in view space by the projection matrix brings it into Normalised Device Coordinates. Graphics cards these days apparently like to consider points between $(-1, -1, -1)$ and $(1, 1, 1)$ (if you're OpenGL, that is. DirectX is different - it prefers $(-1, -1, 0)$ to $(1, 1, 1)$ instead). Points in this space are called Normalised Device Coordinates and anything outside of the aforementioned ranges will be cut off. No exceptions.
  • Image Space - When your scene has been through the entirety of the Graphics pipeline described above, it will find itself in Image Space. Image space is 2D (most of the time) and references the actual pixels in the resulting image.

Converting between all these different coordinate spaces is best left up to the vertex shader - it's much easier to shove a bunch of transformation matrices at it and get it to do all the calculations for you. It's so easy, you can do it in just 11 lines of vertex shader code:

#version 330
uniform mat4 uModel; // The model matrix
uniform mat4 uView; // The view matrix
uniform mat4 uProjection; // The projection matrix

in vec3 vPosition; // The position of the current vertex

void main() 
{ 
    gl_Position = vec4(vPosition, 1) * uModel * uView * uProjection;
}

If you made it this far, congratulations! That concludes our (rather long) journey through the graphics pipeline and its associated coordinate spaces. We looked at each of the various shaders and what they do, and learnt about each of the different coordinate spaces involved and why they are important.

I hope that someone besides myself found it both useful and educational! If you did, or you have any questions, please post a comment below. If you have spotted a mistake - please correct me in the comments below too! I try to make sure that posts like this one can be used by both myself and others as a reference in the future.

Sources

Recording animated gifs on Linux with Silentcast

Using Silentcast

A few months ago I was asked how I created animated gifs on Linux, and I said that I use silentcast. I also said that I'd write a blog post on it. I've been very busy since then, but now I have found some time when I remembered to post about it and am not exhausted.

Silentcast is a very versatile screen recording application that outputs either a set of png images, an animated gif, or 2 different types of video. It uses png files to store frames, so it isn't suitable for recording at a high fps or for very long, but it is still brilliant for recording short clips for your blog or to accopany a bug report.

Silentcast's dialogs stay in front of everything else that you have open, so you don't need to worry about loosing the window somewhere along the line. It integrates nicely with the Unity desktop (I haven't tried others yet), which makes it feel more intuitive and makes it easer to use. It also allows you to modify the intermediate png files before the final product is stitched together, too, allowing for precise edits to make the resulting gif loop perfectly.

It is written in bash, which makes it perfectly suited for usage on both Mac and Linux system , but I don't think that Windows is supported as of the time of posting. The other issue is that it took me a little while to work out how to record a custom area - this is done by the "Transparent Window Interior" option under "Area to be recorded". I also find it to be a little bit unpoliished around the edges (the icon especially needs some work), but overall it is an excellent piece of software that makes recording an animated gif on Linux a breeze - it's streets ahead of any other competing projects.

The animated gif above was taken and modified from Silentcast's GitHub project page.

Easy Bezier Curves on the HTML5 Canvas

This is a follow up post to the vector.js post that I made last week, and depends on the vector class I released then. Please take a look at that post first.

Last week, I released a simple Ecmascript 6 vector class that I wrote. It's mildly interesting on its own, but this post is the real reason I wrote that other one. Using that vector class, I then went ahead and wrote my own bezier curve class, that supports an arbitrary number of control points. Before I continue, here's the code:

(Gist, Raw)

I was surprised by how easy the bezier curve algorithm was to implement. Basically, you loop over all your control points, finding the point that lies in a specific percentage of the distance between the current point and the next one. You then repeat this process until you have just a single point remaining. This results in a smooth curve that is skewed towards all of the given control points.

In my implementation, I did it recursively, with all the magic happening in the interpolate() function. It performs the above algorithm given a time between 0 and 1, and spits out the interpolated value. I called it a time here because bezier curves are often used to smooth out animations, and I travel along the line in the curve() function when applying it to the given canvas rendering context.

To use it, you first create an instance like so:

var bz = new BezierCurve([
    new Vector(38, 41),
    new Vector(96, 302),
    new Vector(807, 12)
]);

Then, in your rendering function, you can ask your new bezier curve to add itself to any given canvas rendering context like this:

// ...

context.beginPath();
// ...
bz.curve(context, 32);
// ...
context.stroke();

// ...

The segmenting algorithm in action.

The second argument in the curve() call above is the number of segments to use when rendering. This tells the bezier curve class how many different points along the line it should calculate. More segments make it smoother, but will consume more processing power when first calculated. Pick just enough that you can't tell that the bezier curve is made up of lines - this is different for every curve.

I added a caching function to it too, so if you call the curve() function with the same number of segments more than once, it uses the interpolated values it calculated previously instead of calculating them all over again. This isn't the case if you call it with a different number of segments each time, however. If you want to do this, I suggest that you create a new instance for each different segment number that you need.

That concludes this post on my own bezier curve class. It's a little bit buggy in places (see the gif above), but I haven't managed to track down the issue. It should work fine for most purposes, though. If you do manage to spot the mistake, please let me know!

Update 24th January 2016: I've replaced the original code with an embedded version of the gist in order to keep it up to date, since I've revised it slightly sinec writing this blog post.

Cool Resources: Subtle Patterns

An example of a pattern from subtlepatterns.com.

I have a different sort of post for you today: A post about pair of websites that I have found that are really quite useful. Quite often when I am creating a website or webpage for some reason or other (today I needed one for bloworm), I keep finding that it always looks a bit plain. These websites that I have found today help to partially solve that problem. They are full of simple tileable textures that look great as backgrounds in many different contexts.

The first is called subtlepatterns.com. It contains a bunch of free to use textures that go well in the background of something without standing out.

The second is called transparenttextures.com. It is similar to the website above - but the textures it provides are transparent so that you can overlay them on top of something else. These are good when you have a colour in mind, but want to add a little something to it to make it look a little less plain.

Art by Mythdael